Key References

— Under construction —

Baddeley, R., & Attewell, D. (2009). The relationship between language and the environment: information theory shows why we have only three lightness terms. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1100–1107.
Bompas, A., & O’Regan, J. K. (2006). Evidence for a role of action in colour perception. Perception, 35(1), 65–78.
Funt, B., Logvinenko, A., & Godau, C. (2013). Metamer Mismatching. IEEE Trans Image Process.
Logvinenko, A. D. (2009). An object-color space. Journal of Vision, 9(11), 5 1-23.
Masaoka, K., & Berns, R. S. (2013). Computation of optimal metamers. Opt Lett, 38(5), 754–756.
Philipona, D. L., & O’Regan, J. (2006). Color naming, unique hues, and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties. Visual Neuroscience, 23(3–4), 331–339. Download
Richters, D. P., & Eskew, R. T. (2009). Quantifying the effect of natural and arbitrary sensorimotor contingencies on chromatic judgments. Journal of Vision, 9(4), 27. Download
Vazquez-Corral, J., O’Regan, J. K., Vanrell, M., & Finlayson, G. D. (2012). A new spectrally sharpened sensor basis to predict color naming, unique hues, and hue cancellation. Journal of Vision, 12(6). Download
Witzel, C., & O’Regan, J. K. (2014, August). Color Appearance and color language depend on sensory singularities in the natural environment. European Conference on Visual Perception, Belgrade.
Witzel, C., Cinotti, F., & O’Regan, J. K. (2015). What determines the relationship between color naming, unique hues, and sensory singularities: Illuminations, surfaces, or photoreceptors? Journal of Vision, 15(8), 19–19. Download